Why don’t mining stocks always follow the price of the commodities they produce?

At first glance, a mining company’s share price should move with the commodity it produces. If gold rises, gold miners should become more profitable and their shares should rise; if iron ore falls, iron ore producers should see lower revenue and profits.

In practice, the relationship often breaks down. Gold can rise significantly while gold miners barely move, and miners sometimes fall even as the commodity reaches new highs.

The reason is that a commodity and a mining company are two fundamentally different investments. A commodity’s price is set by supply, demand, inventories and financial market activity. A mining company is an operating business whose value also depends on how much it produces, what it costs to extract, how efficiently it operates, how much debt it carries and how much cash it returns to shareholders.

Investors buying a mining stock are not simply buying the commodity price. They are buying an ownership interest in a business whose future earnings and cash flows are influenced by that price.

Understanding this distinction explains why mining stocks can sometimes outperform their commodities dramatically and at other times significantly underperform them.

1.Operating leverage: why a small change in commodity prices can have a massive impact on mining profits

Uniquely combining both Fundamental and Technical Analysis

Not yet a subscriber? Join now for FREE!

Receive our weekly tips and strategies into your inbox each week.

BONUS: Sign up now to download our 21 page Trading Guide.

A major reason mining stocks do not move in line with commodity prices is operating leverage. Mining companies have substantial fixed and semi-fixed costs that must be paid regardless of the commodity price.

A gold miner needs employees, machinery, electricity, diesel, explosives, processing facilities and transport. Many of these expenses do not change when the gold price moves, so the company runs the same equipment and employs the same workers whether gold trades at $4,000 or $6,000 per ounce.

When prices rise, the extra revenue can flow disproportionately into operating profit because costs stay relatively stable. When prices fall, profit can shrink disproportionately because costs do not decline at the same rate.

Imagine a gold miner producing 500,000 ounces annually with operating costs of $1.7 billion. At $4,000 per ounce, it generates $2 billion in revenue and $300 million in operating profit. If gold rises to $5,000 with costs unchanged, revenue increases to $2.5 billion and operating profit to $800 million.

In this example, gold has increased by 25%, but operating profit has increased by approximately 167%.

This is why mining stocks can rise much more aggressively than the commodity: margins expand, so earnings and cash flow grow faster than revenue.

The reverse is equally important. If gold falls from $5,000 to $4,000, operating profit falls from $800 million to $300 million, a reduction of 62.5%.

This is why mining stocks are described as leveraged exposure to commodity prices, although the leverage works in both directions.

 

2.Mining stocks are forward-looking, whereas investors often focus on current commodity prices

Share prices are forward-looking. They reflect the market’s assessment of future earnings, not just what a company is making today, so mining stocks can decline even when commodity prices are rising.

Imagine gold rises from $4,000 to $5,000 over six months and gold miners rise 60% as investors anticipate higher profits. By the time gold reaches $5,000, most of the improvement may already be priced in, and some investors may sell to realise their profits.

The key distinction is between what actually happens and what the market expected.

Suppose investors expected gold to reach $6,000 but it only reaches $5,000. Despite the gain, miners could underperform. Conversely, if gold falls 5% when investors expected a 20% decline, miners might outperform.

This is why commodity prices and mining stocks can move in opposite directions.

Miners can also peak before the commodity does, if investors anticipate a cyclical peak, rising costs or slowing earnings growth.

3.Production problems can completely offset the benefits of higher commodity prices

Gold does not have to worry about machinery breaking down, missed production targets or strikes. A mining company does, and relatively small operational problems can have significant financial consequences.

Flooding, equipment failures, geological instability, processing plant breakdowns, lower recovery rates, labour disputes and environmental restrictions can all affect production.

Imagine a copper miner expected to produce 200,000 tonnes in a year that announces production of only 160,000. Even if copper prices have risen 10%, earnings expectations may deteriorate because it is producing far less metal than anticipated.

Investors might sell the shares, particularly if they expect the problems to continue.

This is why mining stocks can underperform their commodities even in favourable commodity markets.

4.Currency movements can create a major disconnect between commodity prices and mining stocks

Currency movements matter especially for Australian miners, because many commodities are priced in US dollars while a substantial proportion of their operating expenses are paid in Australian dollars.

If gold increases from US$5,000 to US$5,400 per ounce, an 8% rise, but the Australian dollar strengthens from US$0.65 to US$0.75, the Australian dollar gold price actually declines by approximately 6.4%.

Australian gold producers earn revenue based on the Australian dollar value of their sales, while many of their costs are also in Australian dollars.

The opposite occurs when the Australian dollar weakens: the Australian dollar gold price can rise by much more than the international price.

This is one reason Australian gold miners can sometimes outperform international peers.

Investors should therefore consider the US dollar commodity price, the exchange rate and the company’s realised selling price.

5.Debt and financial leverage can make miners behave very differently from their commodities

Mining companies need enormous amounts of capital to build and maintain their operations, so they frequently use debt. Debt creates another layer of financial leverage that influences how a miner’s share price responds to commodity prices.

Imagine two gold miners that both generate $500 million in annual operating profit. The first has only $100 million in net debt, while the second has $2 billion.

The heavily indebted miner must devote far more cash flow to interest and debt repayments, and could struggle to service or refinance its debt if gold falls.

Investors may therefore assign it a lower valuation.

Operating leverage relates to how selling prices affect operating profits, while financial leverage relates to how debt affects shareholder returns. When the two combine, mining stocks can become extremely volatile.

A heavily indebted miner might underperform even in a rising market, while one that rapidly reduces its debt as prices rise might outperform.

6.Interest rates and broader market sentiment can influence mining stocks independently of commodity prices

Mining stocks are equities, so they can decline during broad market weakness even when the commodity is performing strongly.

Rising interest rates can make bonds more attractive, raise borrowing costs and put downward pressure on equity valuations.

Investors may also fear an economic slowdown and reduce exposure to cyclical companies, which matters particularly for copper and iron ore producers.

A copper miner may benefit from strong prices today, but if investors expect weaker Chinese demand they may sell before the copper price itself falls.

Gold can benefit from falling real interest rates, a weaker US dollar, central bank purchases and safe-haven demand, but gold miners can still be sold heavily during stock market downturns.

Buying a gold miner is therefore not the same as buying physical gold or a gold-backed ETF, because the company carries all the additional risks of running a business.

Lauren Hua is a private client adviser at Fairmont Equities.

 An 8-week FREE TRIAL to The Dynamic Investor can be found HERE.

Would you like us to call you when we have a recommendation? Check out our services.

Disclaimer: The information in this article is general advice only. Read our full disclaimer HERE.

Like this article? Share it now on Facebook and X!